Other Concepts

Assertions are a new way of looking at how we describe the business we perform.

As single fundamental building blocks of decision and information they can be configured to represent the business and its information flows

Those that are repeated often, and carry important information, are pivotal in describing the business. Important Assertions are made by Authorities, people charged with making commitments for the organization.

You don’t need technically oriented help to create your AM. If you can adjust your thinking to focus on the information you are half way there. But your IT department will love you if you use AM to speak to them. It leaves the technical decisions to them and the business decisions to you.

Veracity of information is often overlooked and is pivotal to accuracy and responsibility.

To make a business work requires complex movement of information throughout and outside an organization. Knowing the source and target, and the nature of the information drives decisions on accuracy, privacy, and technology.

A network more strongly represents how the organization is formed naturally. Linear walks through the network helps understand its parts. Hierarchies showing how information is gathered to support a final decision help understand rationale.

A division or view can support a perspective. Collecting all the Assertions made by a Departments can give clarity of information flows between them. Similarly collecting Assertions made outside the organization, supplying or using information. gives a clear understanding of stakeholders.

If the supporting information can be translated into the outputs by a calculation, or a set of business rules. then it can be implemented in software or a business rules engine. The information it produces still considered to be made from the Authority.

A Frame defines the structure of the information supplied by an Assertion. There is a continuum between structured and unstructured information. The Frame also states the meaning of the values it contains.

The receipt of incoming information from separate sources and its compilation into a readable and available format to present to the Authority may be automated. The determination must still be performed by a person, but the arrangement of the output may be facilitated by software to produce a valuable product.

The well defined Assertion lends itself to implementation in a prototype system. If a single Assertion can be built in software, receiving a populated Frame from another Assertion and passing the output forward. And if the Connection is provided by the software. Then the result is a working prototype in the form of an engine that presents incoming information to a test Authority allowing them to confirm the Assertion is properly defined.

Identical information from different authorities may be more or less reliable. It cannot be used interchangeably.

Concept — Assertion Modeling is oriented to milestone, status, and events

When information is delivered from an Assertion it is a business event. It may trigger other assertions to re-determine; perhaps to authorize a fund transfer or publish an article. Or it may deliver information on the status of a late, unfinished project.

Assertion Models can describe any business. An auctioneer makes an assertion by stating an amount, asking for a bid. That assertion is transmitted verbally and it’s commonly recognized meaning is a request for another Assertion. A bidders raised hand is an assertion, transmitted visually with its own framed meaning, ‘I commit to buy at that amount’.

A lie is an Assertion. Just like the business world, only the veracity of the Authority can be used to decide on subsequent decisions. An Assertion may not be connected; it will fall on deaf ears.

An Assertion on organizational change (so necessary for innovation) requires the inspection of the current structure (analysis of the AM) and its output may be an instruction for current Assertions to be changed and re-implemented.

There is not a different kind of description for strategic models, or financial models. Different Authorities, same language. Pull out the strategic statements for a high level perspective. Pull out the operational statements for an operational perspective. Look at the connections between. They are the objectives and the progress reports.

Each modeled Authority has a specification section that states how it is to be determined. It becomes the responsibility of the Authority to conform to that specification. The collection of the specifications for a given authority summarize the responsibilities of the that Authority.

These concepts make Assertion Modeling a powerful paradigm shift!